|
St. Petersburg Times
Sunshine Sunday editorial
"Improper services
to capitalists are usually rendered behind closed doors''
said President Theodore Roosevelt, who knew first hand
the corruption and self-dealing politicians engaged
in away from the public's gaze. As Roosevelt suggests,
the best way to keep government accountable is to open
it to the sunshine. We are lucky in
Florida, our Constitution guarantees citizens access
to public records and meetings in a way that is as
far-reaching as any state in the nation.
But every year the Legislature tries to draw the shades,
and this session is no exception.
Without a strong commitment to public records and open
meetings, Floridians would be unable to track where
their tax money is going or the content of contracts between the state
and private vendors.
Back room decisions could be made among elected officials
without public knowledge or input. And the work-product of government:
environmental
studies, building and restaurant inspections, and
police disciplinary records, could be put out of reach.
To mark our commitment to open government, the St.
Petersburg Times is joining newspapers around the state
to promote the third annual ""Sunshine Sunday,'' organized by the Florida
Society of Newspaper Editors. The point is to raise awareness of the
inestimable value of having our public officials and all mechanisms of
government operate in the sunshine, and the dangers posed to governmental
accountability during this year's legislative session.
Perhaps the most concerning measure of the nearly 60
open government exemptions that have been proposed
so far is one that would prevent law enforcement agencies and private
individuals from keeping
a record of firearm owners after 60 days. Policing
agencies generally do not collect or cull through the names of gun owners
but they do review
lists of gun sales at pawn shops, made available in
electronic form. If that information has to be expunged after two months,
guns used later
in crimes will be harder to track. The bill (H.B. 155),
which is being pushed by the National Rifle Association and has many
detractors among
law enforcement, would levy a fine of up to $5 million
for any violation. Barbara Petersen, president of Florida's First Amendment
Foundation,
says of the bill: "It sort of takes your breath away, it's so stunningly
bad.'' The measure has already passed the House.
Another House-passed exemption would give House Speaker
Johnnie Byrd's pet project - a publicly-funded Alzheimer's
center - the ability to operate without public scrutiny. While it might
make sense
to protect the trade secrets and proprietary information
of a research facility, the legislation (H.B. 147) would also close off
information
on its corporate officers and employees - details the
public should know.
And this is the second year in a row that the Legislature
is proposing to give a special public records exemptions
to the cell phone records of all law enforcement personnel. Under the
bill (S.B.
2370), the public would be unable to scrutinize the
potential misuse of a taxpayer-funded cell phone.
Petersen says there are some strong voices in Tallahassee
who will attempt to stand as bulwarks against such
entrenchments, but every year it is a struggle to keep
the special interests from darkening
their little corner. These dilutions damage the ability
of Floridians' to be knowledgeable about how their
state is being run, and each should
be vigorously opposed.
Back to top | Return
to fsne.org
|