|
Port Charlotte Sun Herald
Sometimes we
forget importance
of Sunshine laws
Frank Lukasik,
a member of the local Curmudgeon Club, recently penned
a guest column critical of Florida's
Sunshine laws. Lukasik argued that the laws handcuff
elected officials — making it too
difficult for them to share information or come to
a consensus on key issues.
While Lukasik makes a legitimate point, the inconvenience
of working in the Sunshine is minuscule compared to
the alternative.
Florida's Sunshine Laws were passed to guarantee the
government is responsible to the people. Without
these guidelines, we may not know how or why a bill comes
to pass or whether a lawmaker has
financial ties to an industry affected by his legislation.
We may not know that a rapist is loose in our neighborhood,
that a sexual offender
lives at our child's bus stop or that our local county
commission or city council has signed a contract
that will a) raise our taxes, or b)
unjustly reward an individual or organization. These
are just a few examples of the protection awarded
the public through the state's Sunshine Laws.
Recently, in a key court decision, a circuit judge
unsealed records in a criminal case against the producer
of the risque video series "Girls Gone Wild." The records
had been sealed while prosecutors pursued what they
said was an ongoing case against
a man accused of racketeering and promoting the sexual
performance of a child.
In opening the documents, Judge Dedee Costellor wrote
that secrecy can only diminish respect for the court.
Secrecy can also stain the public's perception of our
Legislature. Last year, legislators voted to give $310
million of taxpayer money to Scripps Research Institute
to lure the biomedical industry to
South Florida. Lawmakers wisely decided to form an
agency to administer how the money was dispersed. But, lawmakers
wanted to keep the public in the dark about how those funds were being
spent.
Another problem area is on its way to being cleared
up after Gov. Jeb Bush expressed concern over fund-raising
organizations called committees of continuing existence.
These groups were able to
raise limitless amounts of money for lawmakers seeking
offices such as the Speaker of the House or Senate
president. There were no restrictions
on how much money could be raised or how it could
be used and no requirement to tell who contributed.
Lawmakers who are uncomfortable working in the public
light, need to conform and temper their annual assault
on Sunshine Laws. In Florida, the public has a right
to know.
Back to top | Return
to fsne.org
|